MUMMY TALKS

[--DEAN--]

BEEN PLAYING MUMMY TALKS IN THE LOCAL PUB FOR A FEW WEEKS NOW AND NO LUCK TRYING TO FORCE IT. ONE GUY LOST 140 QUID AND WALKED AWAY WITH JUST THE FLUFF IN HIS POCKETS .ANYONE TRIED THIS MACHINE IF SO HELP WOULD BE VERY NICE .[/b]

[kidgloves]

DON'T SHOUT!

Mummy talks is a reglass of Pick yer Pesos. There was an updated chip that made the cash gamble a little less predicatable, early chips rarely shafted you on good numbers, the new chip will do you often. This makes it hard to see where the bar is on the cash gamble when you start playing. To be fair an all out £140 force should have yielded at least a couple of Jackpots even if it had just streaked. The £10 triple bars were also blocked out of the nudges side on more recent chips...a bit like Subbeteo, these are not to be forced lightly...an average cost of £50-60 for a JP then even if it streaks you are only looking at £15 profit mostly. Not worth the risk any more in my view.

[--DEAN--]

THANKS WILL GIVE THIS ONE A MISS AND TRY THE ONES IN THE LOUNGE PROVIDED I CAN BEAT THE LOCAL SHARK TO IT FIRST

[Topthelot]

impossible to have put £140 without a JP even if it had dumped the £100 bonus streak only a credit before

tighter than PYP as kidgloves says but i still feel worth the force if first cash gamble goes to £5

forget the reel appeal on redline grape for possible JP off reel blasts trick thingy - rarely worked on early chip versions of PYP, def. not on this

[slotter1]

impossible to have put £140 without a JP even if it had dumped the £100 bonus streak only a credit before

tighter than PYP as kidgloves says but i still feel worth the force if first cash gamble goes to £5

forget the reel appeal on redline grape for possible JP off reel blasts trick thingy - rarely worked on early chip versions of PYP, def. not on this

Crap - if you get one in the seventies (%age wise) it would take a lot more than £140 to j/p after the ton dump.
I see you know your machines!

[Totty2]

Someone shoot this slotter1 muppet

[crazyjimmy]

Have to agree top - not that I would advise forcing a PYP or MT which has just dropped the ton! Couldn't personally see it taking much more than half that as an absolute maximum before dropping a JP, although granted the streak pot won't have had time to refill!!!!!

[Topthelot]

Crap - if you get one in the seventies (%age wise) it would take a lot more than £140 to j/p after the ton dump.
I see you know your machines!

:o

a lot more than £140 eh?

just what do you think the cycle is on these? *SIGH*

oh, and PLEASE let me know where you play, if its within 100 miles i might be tempted to pay a visit

[Booked_moss]

TTL i have seen a machine do more than £140 for a jackpot (not me and luckly i know why it did it) guy put in £180 for a jackpot n a certain red which had been paying out quite a few amounts in pervious weeks and had to make it back at some point, buit from normal play you should see a jackpot within a ton (have had £120 for a jackpot before though but only once).

[Topthelot]

RED - says it all

i had a Jewelstrike block for over £100 - in Leeds railway station of all places - fuckknows why i was playing in there for so i deserved everything i got

however, mummy talks definitely dont play like a RED. £140 for a single JP is pure bull, the entire cycle is only every £300 or so (even on shitty %age) unless slotter1 was collecting small wins and hoping for a JP from what, generousity?!, hes still talking nonsense