Which of these would you consider the worst 'beat'?

**PokerWoody** · 10th January 2008, 11:29 PM

Still interesting I think. It just shows how people view these things differently.

Personally I think bad beats are like religious gods - they are there if you wanna believe in them, but they clearly don't really exist in the way that people want to believe in them.

I still say that from my original post hands 1 & 3 are the biggest examples of variance being cruel to me, although neither is really a bad beat, imo.

**Rich Ghost** · 11th January 2008, 10:06 AM

I don't like all this agreement with RevStu.

2 is the worst.

All normal.

Poker sucks.

**RevStu** · 11th January 2008, 02:31 PM

Originally Posted by Rich Ghost

I don't like all this agreement with RevStu.

I agree.

**Raiser** · 11th January 2008, 02:40 PM

My defination of a bad beat is... anything i 'LOL' at. Bad beats rock and i love them, even if i am on the recieving end of them.

**PokerWoody** · 11th January 2008, 03:46 PM

My definition of a bad beat is the M5 flooding. This is bad because a) it will take me yonks to get him, b) It's Friday. Friday's are for drinking and merriment.

**Raiser** · 11th January 2008, 03:59 PM

Originally Posted by PokerWoody

My definition of a bad beat is the M5 flooding. This is bad because a) it will take me yonks to get him, b) It's Friday. Friday's are for drinking and merriment.

Yep, i did laugh. It is a bad beat. UL WP GG FU

**Dice Man** · 11th January 2008, 04:27 PM

Originally Posted by PokerWoody

My definition of a bad beat is the M5 flooding. This is bad because a) it will take me yonks to get him, b) It's Friday. Friday's are for drinking and merriment.