Errr... this is quite good http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELGYwIJjgwE&eurl=
Then this call followed ......... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnaoQXvXfd4&eurl=
Last edited by POB666; 7th December 2006 at 01:25 AM.
Originally Posted by Thor2007
He knew he was beat though, he was paying for info and like he said he "was just seeing if he was playing good" and by putting him on that hand he would have gained a confidnence boost and sometimes a confidence boost is vital at a tableOriginally Posted by lucky_scrote
Originally Posted by Thor2007
Obviously it cant of been that big of a pot in relation to their stacks or Negreanu wouldnt of done it. However i do believe his is willing to make the call on the river to see what sexton had and therefore how he played that particular hand in a particular wayOriginally Posted by lucky_scrote
Originally Posted by Thor2007
Ive seen every episode of HSP, i know what you mean, but if he didnt suffer those horrendous losses from a few bad beats he would have been up a LOT, i do get your point though. Anyone ever called knowing they were beat but they just wanted to see how their opponent played a certain hand?
Originally Posted by Thor2007
I do that all the time, usually in limit though. When you're beat in no limit it's just stupid to call a big raise on the end. It's pretty stupid in limit too, but I just want to be justified in calling them fish when they turn over 95o and they called my pre-flop raise out of position. Calling station fish!
-SenecaThere is nothing which Fortune does not dare.
-Robert J. AumannIn interactive decision making – games -- you must consider what other people would do if you did something different from what you actually do.
- Napoleon BonaparteThe great general is not he who makes fewest mistakes, but he who can best take advantage of the mistakes of his enemy.
Bookmarks