It's a great game I think....
Game #3881417434: Hold’em Blackjack SL (400/800/800-4000) - 2006/11/05 - 14:52:54 (UK)
Table "HoldEm Blackjack £10 3792517 - 1" Seat 4 is the button.
Seat 3: Blacky004 (4137.50 in chips)
Seat 4: gizbo (9800 in chips)
Seat 5: Woody (8287.50 in chips)
Seat 6: Paul065 (7775 in chips)
Woody: posts the ante 100
Paul065: posts the ante 100
Blacky004: posts the ante 100
gizbo: posts the ante 100
----- ROUND #1 -----
Woody: posts small blind 200
Paul065: posts big blind 400
dealt to Woody [8]
Blacky004: calls 400
gizbo: folds
Woody: calls 200
Paul065: checks
----- ROUND #2 -----
dealt to Woody [8][K
]
dealt to Paul065 [A]
dealt to Blacky004 [7]
Woody: checks
Paul065: bets 800
Blacky004: folds
Woody: raises to 1600
Paul065: calls 800
----- ROUND #3 -----
Woody: stands
Paul065: hits
Paul065: hits
Paul065: stands
----- ROUND #4 -----
Woody: checks
Paul065: checks
----- SHOW DOWN -----
Woody: shows [8h Ks] (18 )
Paul065: mucks hand [6c Ad Qh Jd] (27 busted)
Woody collects 4800 from Main pot
----- SUMMARY -----
Total pot 4800 Main pot 4800 Rake 0
Seat 3: Blacky004 folded
Seat 4: gizbo (button) folded
Seat 5: Woody (small blind) showed [8h Ks] and won (4800) with 18
Seat 6: Paul065 (big blind) mucked [6c Ad Qh Jd] (27 busted)
Is this some kind of blackjack STT? If it is (I havent really thought through how to play this game), but maybe the guy who busted can see your 8, sees that you have stuck and must presume you have 18, so when he reaches 17 realises that he has to draw again in order to beat you?
-SenecaThere is nothing which Fortune does not dare.
-Robert J. AumannIn interactive decision making – games -- you must consider what other people would do if you did something different from what you actually do.
- Napoleon BonaparteThe great general is not he who makes fewest mistakes, but he who can best take advantage of the mistakes of his enemy.
I think the first card remains secret? Although could be wrong.Originally Posted by Confabulator
This sounds like quite a good game, but obviously there is a lot of emphasis on if you actually get the cards on not, i can imagine a lot of pots would be split
Originally Posted by Thor2007
When the cards are dealt I think its the first card thats shown? Only one card is shown anyway!
I wasn't a big fan of the game myself, I only played a freeroll or 2 that William Hill did though. I lost all my chips 'cos I had an Ace showing and didn't take anymore cards to bluff that I had Blackjack, but it didn't work as someone else had it!![]()
First card isn't shown, second card is. It's an excellent game, really good simple hand reading practice.
Bookmarks