I don't doubt that it works, but once I thought I'd try extra hard to win a normal STT. So I got a notepad out and wrote about how each player played, what kinds of hands they called with and how much they folded etcetera. I was the first out because I went all in against someone who'd bluffed consistently and he had AA. The thing is in such a short space of time he'd only actually bluffed twice out of two opportunities, but to me that was a 100% bluffer. The fact is I was concentrating so much on what they'd done already that I'd lost track of all other factors in the game. Maybe if I played with those same people 100 times it would help, but until that point it just distracts. Probably their actions in that game could be attributed 90% to what cards they were given and only 10% to their actual style. Over a long period of time it could start working. Probably what'll happen is you'll see a player you have notes for who you don't recognise, and you'll overplay against him by putting him in the category you've noted. And probably you've only played against him once before.
What you should do is write about a player every time you play them, but only start consciously using the notes against them when you have 3 seperate notes for them i.e. you've played them at least 3 times. That'll give you a better picture of how they play. And if each set of notes describes them as a different style of player you need to keep going without taking into account what's already there.
I saw an intrview with T.J.Cloutier once and he said that he could remember the face and style of play of everybody he's ever played. And sometimes that knowledge has helped him beat somebody he hadn't played for 20 years. I reckon saying that sort of thing is mostly just to scare opponents, particularly amateurs who might find themselves up against him. With people believing that about him they'll constantly be scared and he'll have that advantage.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks