How many 5 years could you take on in a fight?

[PokerWoody]

I'm not sure it it was here we were discussing it or not, I can't find the thread so maybe not. Anyway...

How many five year olds do you reckon you could take on at once and win in a fight?

The rules are that once you are down you loose. When you put a 5yr old down they stay down and can't come back. The 5yr olds will attack you enmasse.

So whats your 5yr old fight number?

Examples of 5 year olds:

[waltypies]

When you mean down do you mean if they push you down on the floor thats it or punch you down?

Just need to know as there is a big difference

PS Did you steal an old picture of lee on the right??

[CitrusSR]

Where will the fight be taking place? E.g. will there be a wall I could have my back against? Will there be any weapons involved?

Great question by the way! haha


You'd realistically only be taking 3-4 on at a time max so it'd be a matter of stamina more than anything. So...I reckon I could take quite a lot on at once but they would get the better of me after say 5 minutes of fighting cos I'd be nackered, maybe not even that long hahaha

On a side note, its interesting that ive given this more thought than any poker related post on here for months

[waltypies]

I am going out on a limb here and i reckon 25 of the buggers. But this is assuming this is full on fighting and not just pushing them. I reckon i could clothesline a good few of them. Boot a few in the face and generally charge at the little shits with a big knee to the face. Hell maybe even a flying kick could sort a few out.

Thinking about it maybe even more hell say 30. Come and av a go if you think your hard enough

[PokerWoody]

No weapons or any sort, just your fists and your boots.

No walls or anything to contain you, so they could come from all angles.

In order to win they just have to get you to the ground, once you get them to the ground they are 'dead'.

[Prowler]

i guess if they are all rushing ya you gotta grab the closest one and throw him at a few taking out a pile then grabbing another by the ankles and swinging him round like a club into the rest, keeping that bit of distance should help do bout 60 or so until ya arms get tired lmfao

post of the year candidate!!

[Dice Man]

On first thought I decided that, like Walty, I could take down about 30 with big kicks and pushes, but now I'm thinking maybe I wouldn't get more than 5 down? What happens if you go for a big boot and about 3 hang on to your leg, and the rest just pile on you when your temporarily immobilized?

Basic question: how vicious are they going to be? Are they capable of major aggression or are these how we'd expect 5 year-olds forced to fight to actually behave, weak and scared? I think the answer would depend heavily on how psychotic the kids were.

[waltypies]

I keep wanting to smack that kid on the right in the face.

He has one of those faces which just says PUNCH ME

[PokerWoody]

Basic question: how vicious are they going to be? Are they capable of major aggression or are these how we'd expect 5 year-olds forced to fight to actually behave, weak and scared? I think the answer would depend heavily on how psychotic the kids were.

I think we should assume that they are hyped up, perhaps after watching an episode of Teenage Mutant Ninja turtles or something, but not proper mental vicious.

I think 30 is a high number. I think i'd struggle with anything over 10.

[Dice Man]

I reckon if I were in command of 30 of these 5-year olds, I could advise them of a strategy that could give them victory over the adult without a single casualty, unless the adult was particularly tough to beat, or particularly tall. I think they'd have a tough time taking down Lennox Lewis but the average fit adult they could take.