View Single Post
Old 24th May 2006, 02:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
drwinston
Rank: Player
 
Last Online:
26th May 2007 10:09 AM

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Behind you
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sligobhoy
10 per player across the board means there is fook all difference between coming 16th or 8th even up to 4th!!
that's the same no matter what the bonus system is unless like you say there's some sort of sliding system which IMO is too complicated.

The idea of increasing the bonus system was to make it more fair for people that play in highly attended games. For example on Monday night there were approx 35-40 players at Seven whereas on the Sunday night (I think) someone attended a game that only started with 5 players. The person who won the game at seven only got about 18 more points than the person who won a STT that started with 5.

Basically what I'm trying to say is its not about giving the winner even more points than lets say 16th place, it's about giving more points to people who do well in games that start with more people, therefore the 10 points per person would actually be the fairest.

If all games started with 20-30 people it wouldn't really be an issue but it seems a little unfair that people can travel to the "unpopular" games to gain easier points, especially towards the end of month when they're chasing for something.
__________________

Digg this Post! Del.Icio.Us this Post! Technorati this Post! Furl this Post! Mister Wong this Post! Newsvine this Post! Spurl this Post! Reddit this Post! Netscape this Post!
vChips: 570

drwinston is offline  
Reply With Quote